Interplay between science and politics

In an idealised world, it is easy to imagine that science exists outwith the reaches and influence of politics. However science does not exist in a perfect vacuum of objectivity, and is instead swayed by the ever moving currents of policy and government. The relationship between science and politics is delicate and essential for a functional society to prosper. 

How does Science need Politics?

Essentially, science depends on funding for progress to be made. While investment in science can and is contributed from the private sector, most research largely depends on government grants.

These grants are allocated according to the priorities of policymakers and governments, injecting much-needed cashflow into some fields of research, while others run dry. When the political climate changes, so do the scientific agendas. This was seen when the UK voted to leave the EU in 2016, cutting off funding opportunities that were previously available for research across all fields. Political shifts such as these alter the course of scientific research significantly, so it is vital to understand that without government grant funding, scientific innovation struggles.

How does Politics need Science?

On the other hand, without scientific insight, effective and appropriate policymaking becomes impossible. Many policymakers are required to rule on the management of emerging technologies, natural resources and prioritising public and environmental health. Decisions made around these issues requires policymakers to stay abreast of the latest scientific input to inform them on their options, as well as any potential concerns or benefits.

When politicians selectively use science to further their own agenda, it negatively impacts public trust in the system. It is therefore vital for politicians and policymakers to provide full scientific context for decisions being made, rather than cherrypicking data that persuades the public one way or another. The integration of transparent empirical and objective evidence into the legislative process results in effective and functional governance, rather than ideological and subjective propaganda.

A balancing act

There has always been tension between politics and science, however this tension has been exacerbated in recent years.

Science moves at the pace of research, peer review, and discovery. While politics moves at the pace of election cycles and public opinion. It is important for the two to be aware of these abs and flows to proactively work with each other for real progress to be made both politically and scientifically.

Science tells of the objective truth: what is possible and what the outcomes of our actions are likely to be. Politics speaks on subjective values: deciding what actions are taken based on current societal values and priorities.

What can you do?

Active political and scientific participation is needed to navigate the relationship between scientific truth and political action. Understanding scientific evidence gives you the power and the context to make informed decisions on science-backed policies. This empowers you to advocate for your own and others wellbeing, demonstrating to politicians how you would like resources to be allocated in the pursuit of scientific and political progress.

Paperstars provide a space for research to be rated on quality, potentially allowing policymakers to assess research based on rigour, transparency and accountability. Join us to help our leaders navigate progress using quality scientific literature rather than sensationalised headlines!